Tesco
The Equilibrium Real Funds Rate
Report

The Equilibrium Real Funds Rate

Past, Present, and Future

James D. Hamilton, Jan Hatzius, Ethan S. Harris and Kenneth D. West
Brookings Institution, 2015
Get the Report

Read or listen offline

automatisch generiertes Audio
  • 0.5×
  • 0.75×
  • 1×
  • 1.25×
  • 1.5×
  • 1.75×
1×
automatisch generiertes Audio

Editorial Rating

8

Qualities

  • Comprehensive
  • Analytical
  • Background

Recommendation

The Federal Reserve has kept an extraordinarily accommodative interest rate policy since the Great Recession, with the benchmark federal funds rate holding close to zero. Only in December 2015 did the Fed raise the rate, but only by 0.25%. Determining the equilibrium fed funds rate going forward is a complex undertaking, considering the rate’s relationship to the proper balance between full employment and price stability. Is a low real fed funds rate on the horizon for the foreseeable future, and if so, is this the “new neutral,” just as slower economic growth is the new normal? getAbstract recommends this highly sophisticated academic report to astute readers interested in a deep-dive analysis of equilibrium interest rates.

Take-Aways

  • Federal Reserve policy makers are facing the difficult task of determining what the equilibrium real federal funds rate should be.
  • An analysis of data from as early as 1800 indicates that the connection between the fed funds rate and GDP growth is weak.
  • The current puzzle centers on whether the economy and real rates are trapped in a “secular stagnation.”

About the Authors

James D. Hamilton is an econometrician at the University of California at San Diego. Jan Hatzius is chief economist at Goldman Sachs. Ethan S. Harris heads North America economics at Bank of America Merrill Lynch. Kenneth D. West is an economics professor at the University of Wisconsin.

Comment on this summary or Diskussion beginnen