Melden Sie sich bei getAbstract an, um die Zusammenfassung zu erhalten.

The US Phillips Curve

Melden Sie sich bei getAbstract an, um die Zusammenfassung zu erhalten.

The US Phillips Curve

Back to the ’60s?

Peterson Institute for International Economics,

5 Minuten Lesezeit
5 Take-aways
Audio & Text

Was ist drin?

Economist Olivier Blanchard revisits a 1960s monetary policy favorite, the Phillips Curve, and offers a Mad Men twist to central bankers’ arsenals.

automatisch generiertes Audio
  • 0.5×
  • 0.75×
  • 1×
  • 1.25×
  • 1.5×
  • 1.75×
1×
automatisch generiertes Audio

Editorial Rating

7

Qualities

  • Innovative
  • Inspiring

Recommendation

It has been a long-held article of faith among central bank policy makers that there is no such thing as a free lunch – because monetary policy that aims for lower unemployment will result in higher inflation. Crunching the numbers leads economist Olivier Blanchard to revisit a policy favorite of the 1960s, the Phillips Curve, and to offer a Mad Men twist to central bankers’ arsenals. He posits that a free lunch may be possible, at least for a while, as long as the economy resists the temptations of gluttony. getAbstract recommends this thought-provoking contribution to discussions on monetary policy to economists and financial services professionals.

Summary

The conduct of US monetary policy is challenging central bankers: Inflation’s behavior since the 2008 global financial crisis has been atypical of previous trends. The policies the Federal Reserve pursued in the 1960s and 1970s adhered to the principle of a trade-off between higher inflation and lower unemployment, as quantified by the Phillips Curve. That period taught that this lever of monetary policy couldn’t produce a lasting change in joblessness and that a stronger recession later would offset any additional up-front growth.

But the shape of the Phillips Curve has changed over time. While...

About the Author

Olivier Blanchard, formerly research director at the International Monetary Fund, is a senior fellow at the Peterson Institute for International Economics.

Comment on this summary