Melden Sie sich bei getAbstract an, um die Zusammenfassung zu erhalten.

Trading by Professional Traders

Melden Sie sich bei getAbstract an, um die Zusammenfassung zu erhalten.

Trading by Professional Traders

An Experiment

Federal Reserve Bank of New York,

5 Minuten Lesezeit
3 Take-aways
Audio & Text

Was ist drin?

A novice trying to match trading skills with an investment professional is on a fool’s errand.

  • 0.5×
  • 0.75×
  • 1×
  • 1.25×
  • 1.5×
  • 1.75×
1×

Editorial Rating

7

Qualities

  • Analytical
  • Applicable
  • Hot Topic

Recommendation

In this detailed research report, economists Marco Cipriani, Roberta De Filippis, Antonio Guarino and Ryan Kendall assess the performance differences between professional and nonprofessional financial traders. In an expert-versus-novice contest, the authors find that intellectual capability has little to do with the two groups’ widely dissimilar results; rather, experience emerges as a critical differentiator in investment outcomes. Tyro investors as well as market pros will find useful – but perhaps unsurprising – insights in this rigorous analysis.

Summary

Research shows that cognitive abilities do not account for outcome variations between professional and nonprofessional traders.

It is an axiom that professional financial traders tend to perform better than their novice counterparts. The rationale for the disparity is unclear, as a wide range of factors – including intelligence, training and strategy – could explain the difference. To test these variants, researchers assessed the comparative investing outcomes of professionals with those of undergraduate students, who acted as proxies for inexperienced retail investors. As measures of the two...

About the Authors

Marco Cipriani is an assistant vice president at the Federal Reserve Bank of New York. Roberta De Filippis is a junior policy analyst at the European Banking Authority. Antonio Guarino is an economics professor at University College London, where Ryan Kendall is a senior research fellow.

Comment on this summary