Skip navigation
Deep Dive Into Design
Video

Deep Dive Into Design

How Might We (Re)Assemble Tomorrow? (Introductory Roundtable)


auto-generated audio
auto-generated audio

Editorial Rating

9

Qualities

  • Applicable
  • Engaging
  • Inspiring

Recommendation

In this roundtable from the Mechanics’ Institute, four leading designers chat with Deep Dive Into Design discussion host Nico Chen about the ways design affects people’s lives and may yield unexpected consequences — both good and bad. Carissa Carter, academic director at Stanford’s d.school; Scott Doorley, the school’s creative director; Luam Melake, an interdisciplinary artist and researcher; and Quinlin Messenger, founder and director of the design agency JUST, draw on ideas from Carter and Doorley’s book Assembling Tomorrow to explore how design can nurture empathy and shape a more equitable and sustainable future.

Summary

Design can foster empathy, human connection, and healing.

It’s been said that design serves to overcome the human body’s limitations; but some of the constraints of being human, including human nature itself, don’t allow for transcendence. Design should allow for and even embrace these qualities. For example, Luam Melake creates furniture that pushes back against the tide of digitality in modern life by underscoring the body’s physicality. Her sculptures and woven tapestries, created from industrial materials, also demonstrate how the built environment can trigger subconscious associations and personal memories.

Design can remind people that they’re human — acknowledging and reflecting their human capacities, emotions, and shared responses —&#...

About the Speakers

Designer and geoscientist Carissa Carter is the academic director of Stanford’s d.school. Scott Doorley is a writer, designer, and the school’s creative director. Luam Melake is an interdisciplinary artist and researcher, and Quinlin Messenger is the founder and director of the design agency JUST. Host Nico Chen is the program manager of writing and literature at Mechanics’ Institute.


Comment on this summary