Saltar la navegación
To Disrupt or Not to Disrupt?
Article

To Disrupt or Not to Disrupt?

Disruption isn’t always the right strategy for startups. It’s a choice.


audio autogenerado
audio autogenerado

Editorial Rating

8

Qualities

  • Analytical
  • Applicable
  • Well Structured

Recommendation

Market disrupters enter a market with a new or cheaper product hoping to capitalize on a weakness found in a traditional business – perhaps customers looking for cheaper or more convenient alternatives. Disruption is a choice, however, and opting to work with a legacy company can offer substantial benefits. Entrepreneurs should consider the strategies outlined by Joshua Gans in MIT Sloan Management Review. Gans offers a logical approach for entrepreneurs to weighing alternative, and often more successful, strategies to the path of disruption.

Take-Aways

  • Market disrupters aim to capitalize on vulnerabilities in existing businesses.
  • Disrupting incumbents isn’t the only choice: Creating alternative business plans can highlight the benefits of cooperation.
  • The strategy isn’t necessarily final: Entrepreneurs can choose to pivot from one option to another.

About the Author

Joshua Gans is a professor of strategic management and holds the Jeffrey S. Skoll Chair of Technical Innovation and Entrepreneurship at the Rotman School of Management at the University of Toronto. 


Comment on this summary or Comenzar discusión