Rejoignez getAbstract pour lire le résumé !

Capital and Ideology

Rejoignez getAbstract pour lire le résumé !

Capital and Ideology

Belknap Press,

15 minutes de lecture
7 points à retenir
Audio et texte

Aperçu

According to economist Thomas Piketty, all regimes try to legitimize inequality through ideology.

résumé audio créé automatiquement
  • 0.5×
  • 0.75×
  • 1×
  • 1.25×
  • 1.5×
  • 1.75×
1×
résumé audio créé automatiquement

Editorial Rating

9

Qualities

  • Comprehensive
  • Eye Opening
  • Visionary

Recommendation

In this thought-provoking sequel to his bestselling Capital in the Twenty-First Century, economist Thomas Piketty expands his focus on inequality to the prodigious “political-ideological repertoire” that constitutes the economic narratives of major nations. This description helps explain the book’s length of more than 1,000 pages, but even the more ponderous sections of Piketty’s tome reward the reader with refreshing and singular slants on history and ideology. Echoing the truism that change is the only inevitability, Piketty calls for more circumspection and greater discussion of the wider causes and remedies of inequality.

Summary

Throughout history, political systems have justified economic inequality in different ways.

To study different civilizations across time is to realize that nearly every major society produces economic inequality. And because inequality is inherently controversial, leaders always strive to construct narratives that legitimize the factors, systems or rules that generate the inequity. Ideologies – or the collections of beliefs and theories that together rationalize the trade-offs and compromises societies make – play a crucial role. An ideology shapes the way a society is organized and therefore informs the arguments for an “inequality regime.”

Those who benefit from a specific structure contend that inequality arises organically. But history attests that societies adopt inequality regimes through the competition of interests among their politically and economically powerful members. For example, in the feudal society of medieval Europe, regional nobles held sway over both the land they owned and the peasants who lived and worked on their properties. The tithes paid to the church, plus the large amounts ...

About the Author

Thomas Piketty, a professor at the Paris School of Economics, is the author of the best-selling Capital in the Twenty-First Century.

Comment on this summary

  • Avatar
    Sign in to share your opinion
  • Avatar
    M. E. 4 years ago
    To the casual reader, the arguments make sense, not because they are sound, but because they appeal to our basic feelings of justice and fairness. <br> <br>Unfortunately Piketty is a very idealist left wing propagandist. <br> <br>His arguments assume way to much without offering proof, and use "equality" as an ideal, to appeal to our irrational feelings, combined with the always fashionable environmental theme, neglecting the fact that what matters to the poor of the world is not really inequality, but the capacity to actually produce wealth by their own means.
    • Avatar
      4 years ago
      Couldn't agree more!
    • Avatar
      4 years ago
      Poor don't "produce wealth", state does (Stephanie Kelton). Inequality may not be the biggest problem with the current system, precarity is by far worse and affects everybody (Albena Azmanova) which makes Piketty a bit dated already.

      I haven't read this book yet (it sits on my shelf waiting), but after reading his previous book 'Capital in the 21st Century', I can't believe that Piketty would just pull things out of the air as his first book is all about data, going back decades and even centuries. I am sure a summary might not be able to do justice to an economist whose works pivots on solid data.