Tesco
Measuring Leadership Development
Book

Measuring Leadership Development

Quantify Your Program’s Impact and ROI on Organizational Performance

Jack Phillips, Patricia Pulliam Phillips and Rebecca L. Ray
McGraw-Hill, 2012

Read offline

Editorial Rating

8

Qualities

  • Innovative
  • Applicable

Recommendation

Human resources professionals and leaders know it’s important to measure, track and evaluate their investments in human capital programs, yet HR is notoriously behind other areas of business in making budget decisions based on evidence and data. HR gurus Jack Phillips and Patricia Pulliam Phillips teach constantly about measurement; they publish at least one book each year, often for HR professionals. In this volume, writing with learning expert Rebecca L. Ray, they focus on leadership development, offering a clear, credible process for collecting, measuring and reporting on training outcomes and for improving, expanding or ending those programs based on hard evidence. getAbstract recommends their packed-tight manual to readers seeking the skill and knowledge to evaluate leadership development programs and to help their firms make better decisions.

Take-Aways

  • Your organization’s success depends on the depth and quality of its leadership.
  • Track, measure and evaluate your investment in training and developing leaders.
  • Ensure that leadership development programs directly affect your organization’s highest-priority needs. Articulate the connections clearly before launching any program.

About the Authors

Former bank president and HR executive, Jack Phillips has written or edited more than 50 books. Patricia Pulliam Phillips, writer or editor of more than 30 books on evaluation, heads the ROI Institute. Rebecca L. Ray leads human capital at the Conference Board.

Comment on this summary or Начать обсуждение

  • Avatar
    Sign in to share your opinion
  • Avatar
    A. B. 1 decade ago
    At a glance, this appears to be a big step towards narrowing the gap between the "Leaders are from Mercury/Trainers are from Saturn" type thinking and lack of collaboration to achieve goals. I'll have to review more closely to test applicability. If the end result is not better leaders, the ROI is organizational dysfunction which is measurable i.e. high turn-over, grievances and low engagement etc.
  • Avatar
    J. S. 1 decade ago
    It would have been good to reference the Kirkpatrick levels of evaluation. It felt like an over simplification of ROI linkage although it did acknowledge the indirect impacts