Tesco
The Case for a Supply-Side Climate Treaty
Article

The Case for a Supply-Side Climate Treaty

The Paris Agreement can be strengthened by a treaty limiting global fossil fuel supply

G. B. Asheim, T. Fæhn, K. Nyborg, M. Graeker, C. Hagem, B. Harstad, M. O. Hoel, D. Lund and K. E. Rosendahl
Science, 2019
References: IPCC (2018) , McGlade & Ekins (2015) , Lazarus & van Asselt (2018) , Green & Denniss (2018) , Piggot et al. (2018) , Hoel (1994) , Rogelj et al. (2017) , Barrett (2003) , Hoel (1996) , Collier & Venables (2015) , Fæhn et al. (2017) , Harstad (2012) , Harstad (2018) , Sinn (2012) , Asheim (2013)
Read the article

Read or listen offline

  • 0.5×
  • 0.75×
  • 1×
  • 1.25×
  • 1.5×
  • 1.75×
1×

Editorial Rating

8

Qualities

  • Analytical
  • Applicable
  • Bold

Recommendation

Decades of efforts to avert the global climate crisis by reducing demand for fossil fuels have been discouragingly ineffective. Reduced demand in one place causes prices to drop, stimulating demand somewhere else. This intriguing paper by a team of European researchers offers new hope for those discouraged by the impasse by suggesting that if a number of countries agreed to cap fossil fuel production, the price signals that result could counterbalance demand-side efforts’ fatal flaws and motivate the development of low-carbon technologies at relatively little cost.

Take-Aways

  • People need to curb fossil fuel use, but reducing demand isn’t working.
  • A combination of demand-side and supply-side limits could provide the needed economic signals.
  • A combined approach would be more palatable to producers than demand-side policies alone.

About the Authors

The nine authors, G.B. Asheim, T. Fæhn, K. Nyborg, M. Graeker, C. Hagem, B. Harstad, M.O. Hoel, D. Lund and K.E. Rosendahl, are part of the Oslo Centre for Research on Environmentally Friendly Energy at the University of Oslo in Oslo, Norway.

Comment on this summary or Начать обсуждение