跳过导航
Resolving Too-Big-to-Fail Banks in the United States
Report

Resolving Too-Big-to-Fail Banks in the United States


自动生成的音频
自动生成的音频

Editorial Rating

8

Qualities

  • Analytical
  • Eye Opening
  • Background

Recommendation

This report from George Mason University’s Mercatus Center provides a detailed, articulate analysis of US large-bank regulation and its historical context. Economists James R. Barth and Apanard Prabha address the “too-big-to-fail” (TBTF) issue and its impact on federal agencies’ policies and practices. The report examines how regulators have handled this problem before and considers how TBTF might again rear its head in the future. The authors also evaluate how the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010 and other regulatory changes might help or hurt bank resolution. Because it presents a complex issue in language that a layperson can understand and from which an expert might gain new insight, getAbstract recommends this levelheaded analysis to regulators, policy makers, financial industry professionals and anyone with a bank account.

Take-Aways

  • The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) insures bank deposits up to a maximum amount per account.
  • FDIC coverage rose from $2,500 in 1935 to $250,000 per bank account in 2008.
  • Massive withdrawals of deposits – a “run” – can push a bank into insolvency.

About the Authors

A senior finance fellow at the Milken Institute, James R. Barth is the Lowder Eminent Scholar of Finance at Auburn University. Apanard Prabha is an economist at the Milken Institute.


Comment on this summary or 开始讨论

More on this topic

Learners who read this summary also read