The Affordable Care Act

Examining the Facts

ABC-CLIO, 2016

15 分钟阅读

10 个要点速记

音频和文本

看看什么内容？

A clear, in-depth, neutral appraisal of the US Affordable Care Act debate.

1×

登录收听有声浓缩书。

Editorial Rating

Qualities

Innovative
Applicable

Recommendation

Health care affects everyone. Americans pay more for it and receive less in return than the people in any other industrialized nation. It accounts for almost one-fifth of America’s GDP and employs millions of people. The controversy and confusion surrounding the Affordable Care Act (ACA) – which represented the biggest change in US health care history – continues unabated years after its narrow, entirely partisan passage in 2010 under the nickname “Obamacare.” Few Americans understand the ACA. Exaggerated claims, sensationalism and outright lies from both sides of the debate make the whole thing incomprehensible to many. Health care policy professor Purva H. Rawal’s objective, nonpartisan reference guide to the ACA may not have you on the edge of your seat, but you’ll come away understanding the law, how it reached this stage and where US health care may be headed. Given the presidential election results, more change is likely. While always politically neutral, getAbstract recommends this manual as rich in research and long on facts.

Summary

“One Hundred Years of Debate”

Few issues sparked such heated discussion, for so long, as “health reform” in the US. The 2010 passage of the Affordable Care Act (ACA) followed “two years of public deliberation” – but a century of debate, ideas and proposals, many of them bipartisan, led up to that point. Nonetheless, no Republican voted for the final bill in 2010. Since then, both sides and their supporters have made exaggerated claims, and offered half-truths and even outright lies, in waging war over the law’s continued existence.

The sheer volume of information, including myths and sensational claims, has made it nearly impossible for ordinary citizens to untangle the truth about the ACA. The evidence-based assessments here offer a nonpartisan, objective evaluation of the ACA through 2015.

ACA Passage and Rollout

Conservatives claim that the ACA was “rammed” into law. Though Democrats and the White House zealously sought bipartisan support for the law, none was forthcoming. Barack Obama’s administration pointed out that the ACA, including its health care “exchanges,” was fashioned largely after the Massachusetts health reform law. Using a strictly...

About the Author

Purva H. Rawal, PhD, served as a US Senate staffer during the ACA debate and joined the nonprofit sector to help implement the ACA and advise industry. She teaches health care policy at Georgetown University.

Comment on this summary

Sign in to share your opinion
M. F. 7 years ago

The health care system was doing fine before the ACA.Only .The quality for most people was adequate and over 285 million had insurance .People were not required to have insurance .Most of the uninsured were young people illegals .Anyone who needed to be treated could get it in an emergency room.Seven years later We still have 30 million without coverage and most of those covered by the ACA Receive it from the expanded Medicaid program which is unsustainable .Most of the promised made were broken and premiums would be unaffordable If they did not subsidize the middle class.We should repeal the whole thing and start from scratch
P. A. 8 years ago

I have listen to hundreds of book is on getAbstract but this one is by far so erroneous and full of lies it is hard to believe they published it. I am an employer with 50 employees and the ACA has been a total disaster premium cost rising 25% sometimes year over year and was cancellations a policies and frustrated employees with the system that is filled with bureaucracy and red tape
J. G. 8 years ago

Given the strong election rhetoric, and now the repeal and delay message, I doubt they have a thoughtful substitute planned. They will repeal it so they meet the election promise but a 3 year delay is nothing but a charade.

Purva H. Rawal