加入 getAbstract 阅读摘要

Bots, #StrongerIn, and #Brexit

加入 getAbstract 阅读摘要

Bots, #StrongerIn, and #Brexit

Computational Propaganda During the UK–EU Referendum

Cornell UP,

5 分钟阅读
5 个要点速记
音频和文本

看看什么内容？

During a divisive event like #Brexit, who dominates the Twittersphere – humans or bots?

自动生成的音频
  • 0.5×
  • 0.75×
  • 1×
  • 1.25×
  • 1.5×
  • 1.75×
1×
自动生成的音频

Editorial Rating

7

Qualities

  • Analytical
  • Innovative
  • Eye Opening

Recommendation

On June 23, 2016, voters in the United Kingdom changed the course of their history when they voted to leave the European Union. Pundits claim social media played a vital role in this unexpected outcome. In this analysis, researchers Philip N. Howard and Bence Kollanyi discuss the prevalence of “political bots” that produced Brexit-related content on Twitter between June 5 and June 12, 2016. They provide evidence for the rise in political bots on Twitter during periods of political strife. Their precursory study firmly sets the stage for what will surely become a growing field of research for years to come. getAbstract recommends this report to those interested in the intersection of big data, automation, social media and public policy.

Summary

Research suggests that in UK elections, 30% of voters don’t decide which way to vote until the week before polling day, and many wait even until the last minute to make up their minds. When feeling unsure, many people turn to family and friends on social media for guidance, but, along the way, something less than human is intercepting them: “political bots.” Political bots are automated social media accounts that create content and interact with other users. “Political actors and governments worldwide” program these accounts to tweet about and comment on...

About the Authors

Philip N. Howard is a sociologist and communication researcher at the University of Oxford’s Oxford Internet Institute. Bence Kollanyi is a PhD candidate in sociology at Corvinus University of Budapest.

Comment on this summary