University of Minnesota - UMN Executive Leadership Insights
Global Brands Find It Hard to Untangle Themselves from Xinjiang Cotton
Article

Global Brands Find It Hard to Untangle Themselves from Xinjiang Cotton

Under pressure to renounce cotton harvested in a Chinese region marked by gruesome repression, they face a backlash from nationalist Chinese consumers.

Peter S. Goodman, Vivian Wang and Elizabeth Paton
The New York Times, 2021
Read the article

Read or listen offline

Amazon Kindle
  • 0.5×
  • 0.75×
  • 1×
  • 1.25×
  • 1.5×
  • 1.75×
1×

Editorial Rating

9

Qualities

  • Applicable
  • Eye Opening
  • Bold

Recommendation

In the globalized world, clothing brands expect criticism that they exploit underpaid workers in undeveloped countries. Now, they face a unique – and especially grave – situation in Xinjiang, China, as Peter S. Goodman, Vivian Wang and Elizabeth Paton report in The New York Times. Xinjiang is the source of 85% of China’s cotton and ground zero for China’s genocidal assault against the Uyghurs. The US government seeks to prevent sale of  Xinjiang cotton products, but the Chinese government has threatened firms that they must ignore its persecution of the Uyghurs or relinquish China’s massive, lucrative market.

Summary

Opponents of China’s persecution of the Uyghurs in Xinjiang are calling for a ban on cotton from the region.

In 2020, H&M, the world’s second-largest clothing retailer, faced accusations of profiting from the Chinese government’s massive repression of the Uyghur people in Xinjiang province. China has driven Uyghurs into mass slave labor camps in a region with significant cotton crops. In response, H&M announced it would cease purchasing cotton from Xinjiang – as did Nike, Burberry and clothing giant PVH.

Protest against the use of Xinjiang cotton by global clothing brands is nothing new. Since globalization’s advent, various international brands have faced consumer objections to their reliance on underpaid, exploited workers in underdeveloped countries like Myanmar and Bangladesh. Corporate responses have followed a standardized...

About the Authors

Peter S. Goodman is a London-based global economic correspondent for The New York Times, for which Vivian Wang is a China correspondent and Elizabeth Paton is a reporter.

Comment on this summary